Skip to content
Ask Sooner All fifty notes

Remote onboarding, written for the person who has just joined

Nobody can see that you are stuck

You have just started, remotely. Almost everything written about onboarding is addressed to your employer, and most of it asks them to do something. These fifty notes are for you, and nothing in them needs anybody's permission: no process to change, no mentor to request, no meeting to move.

When a new employee is learning an unfamiliar workflow, employee monitoring software can show where time is going before a manager assumes that a slow start is an effort problem.

For a separate career or employment reference, consult Indeed.

Hours spent stuck before asking: 31Minutes the answers took, at the same scale: 67One step is one occasion

What the people on this page had to find out, and where from

What you had to knowWhere it came fromWeek

Which repository is the real one

you asked1

Four days of reading the wrong one before it occurred to you to ask

Where the on-call rota lives

written down2

In the handbook, which nobody had mentioned

That the design review is where decisions actually happen

worked out8

Noticed because nothing agreed anywhere else survived it

You found it written down: 1You asked for it: 1You worked it out alone: 1

three things you had to know · nobody told you any of them · the median arrived in week 2 · all three you went and got

Three of the fourteen things one person had to find out in their first twelve weeks, and the week each of them arrived.

50notes for the person who has just joined, not for the people who hired them
6parts, following the order the weeks actually arrive in
31hours one person spent stuck before asking, in twelve weeks
9separate occasions it happened, every one of them to the same person

Nothing here is a benchmark. Every figure on this site is one person's record of their own first twelve weeks, written down at the time, and the only claim made for it is that it happened. Nothing in this collection is legal or employment advice: what a probation period means, what an employer may require of somebody and how any of it is assessed differ by jurisdiction and by contract, and they change.

Six parts, in the order the weeks arrive

Every note belongs to one of them. The line at the foot of each card is what that part cost one person in their first twelve weeks, stated as a thing that happened rather than as a principle.

Before you start

Before you start

The weeks between signing and your first day are yours, and almost nothing you can do with them requires anybody's cooperation.

a fortnight nobody is using

The first week

The first week

Nobody can see that you are stuck, nothing replaces being noticed, and the habits that substitute for it all have to be started deliberately.

fourteen hours, twenty minutes of answers

Who is who

Who is who

The organisation chart records reporting lines accurately and tells you almost nothing about who you will actually need.

four of ten, never introduced

Asking

Asking

Twenty minutes of looking, then a question with what you tried in it, sent to a channel rather than to a person.

twenty-six hours against forty-two minutes

First work

Your first work

Finish something small in week three. The point is not the output; it is everything you are forced to learn in order to get it finished.

one small thing, finished in week three

Ninety days

The first ninety days

The standard you are assessed against is almost never written down, and the window in which you can see the place clearly closes at about week eight.

sixty-six hours, thirty-one of them in month one

One person's first twelve weeks, counted

Three panels, all kept by the same person over the same twelve weeks, and all of them written down at the time rather than remembered afterwards. Nothing here is a benchmark: it is one record, and the only claim made for it is that it happened.

Fourteen things you had to know, and where each of them came from

What you had to knowWhere it came fromWeek

Which repository is the real one

you asked1

Four days of reading the wrong one before it occurred to you to ask

Where the on-call rota lives

written down2

In the handbook, which nobody had mentioned

How to get a staging database password

you asked2

The answer was one sentence and had no owner

That your manager prefers a written update on Mondays

told3

Said in passing, in week three, and would have been useful in week one

How expenses are claimed

written down4

Found by searching for a word you guessed at

Who signs off a schema change

you asked4

Three people were asked before the right one

That Thursday standup is optional

told5

Somebody noticed you were always there and said so

Which of the two deploy guides is current

worked out6

Decided by looking at which one matched the actual scripts

That nobody reads the team channel after 15:00

worked out7

Learned from two unanswered afternoons

Somebody told you, unprompted: 2You found it written down: 3You asked for it: 4You worked it out alone: 5

fourteen things you had to know · two of them somebody told you · the median arrived in week 4 · the other twelve you went and got

A fifteenth line was given to this panel and is not drawn. Its source could not be read, and the whole of this sign is the question of where knowledge came from — a row with an unreadable source would shift the band at the foot of it to nowhere in particular. +5 further lines not shown.

Nine occasions of being stuck, and how long you sat on each before asking

What you were stuck onHours before you askedCost

The staging database would not take your password

3 hanswer: 4 min

You waited because you could not tell whose job it was. The answer was a shared note you had not been sent

The test suite failed only on your machine

6 hanswer: 12 min

You waited because you assumed it was something you had done wrong. It was a missing environment variable and everybody had hit it

You could not find the deploy runbook

1.5 hanswer: 2 min

You waited because it felt like something you were supposed to know already.

Nobody had given you access to the billing dashboard

5 hanswer: 3 min

You waited because you did not want to look as though you were chasing. Access took the other person about three minutes to grant

The specification contradicted the drawing

2 hanswer: 15 min

You waited because you thought you had misread it. You had not, and the drawing was two revisions old

You did not know which branch to start from

4 hanswer: 2 min

You waited because everybody else seemed busy.

A meeting invitation arrived with no agenda

2.5 hanswer: 3 min

You waited because asking felt like criticising the organiser. The organiser had meant to attach it and was glad to be asked

The build broke after your first commit

1 hanswer: 20 min

You waited because you wanted to fix it yourself first. A reasonable instinct, and it cost an hour

You could not tell who owned the pricing table

6 hanswer: 6 min

You waited because the org chart did not say and you did not want to guess wrong. Two of the three people you eventually asked did not know either

Hours you sat on it before askingWhat the answer itself took, once asked

nine occasions · 31 hours spent stuck · 67 minutes of answers · the longest single wait was 6 hours

Two further lines were given to this panel and are not drawn. In one, the answer took longer than the wait did, so waiting was not what cost anything. In the other no reason for waiting is stated, and this sign exists to collect the reasons: without one, the line says only that somebody waited.

The people you were introduced to, and the people you turned out to need

334
Introduced to youNeeded by you

Introduced, and never needed · 3

  • The head of people — met in week 1
  • A director from another division — met in week 1
  • A finance manager — met in week 1

Introduced, and needed · 3

  • Your own manager — met in before you started; needed in week 1
  • The other two people on your team — met in week 1; needed in week 1
  • The designer on the adjacent product — met in week 2; needed in week 6

Needed, and never introduced · 4

  • The person who runs the release — needed in week 2. Found by reading the channel history
  • Whoever owns the billing dashboard — needed in week 3. Found by asking in a channel and waiting two days
  • The person who actually approves schema changes — needed in week 4. Found on the fourth attempt, after asking three wrong people

ten people · six you were introduced to · seven you actually needed · four you had to find yourself

An eleventh line was given to this panel and is not drawn. That person was neither introduced nor needed, and a row like that only inflates the denominator. Roles are named here and people are not: the record this comes from named nobody, which is the only responsible way to keep one. +1 further person not shown.

02 / 06fourteen hours, twenty minutes of answers

The first week

Nobody can see that you are stuck, nothing replaces being noticed, and the habits that substitute for it all have to be started deliberately.

05 / 06one small thing, finished in week three

Your first work

Finish something small in week three. The point is not the output; it is everything you are forced to learn in order to get it finished.

06 / 06sixty-six hours, thirty-one of them in month one

The first ninety days

The standard you are assessed against is almost never written down, and the window in which you can see the place clearly closes at about week eight.

The short version

Ask sooner than feels comfortable, because nobody can see that you are waiting

In an office somebody would have noticed you staring at the same screen for three hours. Remotely nobody notices anything, and the silence that protects you from looking foolish is the same silence that keeps anybody from helping. The thirty-one hours in the panel above were spent by one person in twelve weeks, and the answers they were waiting for took sixty-seven minutes in total.

Workplace tool guides

Make the first weeks easier to understand

Three independently structured comparisons for remote onboarding, knowledge transfer, and workforce operations.